That was one of the questions that I got asked in a quick-fire practice session last week, by a journalist who was employed for the morning to take part in a "media training session" for people from the Symbian Foundation launch team. The idea of the session was to bombard participants with potentially awkward questions, so we could test out various ways to respond. The questions ranged from tame to taxing, from straightforward to subtle, and from respectful to riotous.
One possible answer to the question at the top of this posting is that it is the issue of user experience which deserves the fullest attention. If users continue to be confronted by inflexible technology with unfriendly interfaces, they won't get drawn in to make fullest use of mobile devices and services.
Another possible answer is that it is the issue of complexity which deserves the fullest attention. In this line of thinking, overly complex UIs are just one facet of the problem of overly complex mobile technology. Other facets include:
- Overly difficult development cycles (resulting in products coming late to the market, and/or products released with too many defects), and
- Overly exercised CPU cores and overly bloated software (resulting in products with poor battery life and high cost).
Open source, whereby people can look at source code and propose changes without having to gain special permission in advance, is part of the solution to improving collaboration. Open discussion and open governance take the solution further. Yet another step comes from collaboration tools that provide first-rate source configuration management and issue tracking.
But collaboration often needs clear leadership to make it a reality: a sufficiently compelling starting point on which further collaboration can take place. Without such a starting point, none of the other items I mentioned can hope to make a lasting difference.
That brings me back to the role of the Symbian Foundation. The Symbian Foundation is offering the entire mobile industry what it claims to be the best possible starting point for further collaboration:
- A tried and tested codebase of 40 million lines of code;
- Processes and disciplines that cope with pressures from multiple divergent stakeholders;
- A visionary roadmap that is informed by the thinking of existing mobile leaders, and which spells out the likely evolution of key mobile technologies.

2 comments:
>>it is the issue of collaboration which deserves the fullest attention. We need to find better ways for all the good resources of the mobile industry to be productively aligned addressing the same key risks and opportunities,<<
Unfortunately key opportunity for some may come out as risk for other. So really a tough job ahead. Good Luck!
I'd say a key question is industry structure. Will carriers pick platforms or consumers? At least here in the US (as you noted earlier) carriers seem to be taking sides.
Post a Comment